Research history

Current published edition

Symptoms and sources

As recorded by . This is a dated public record of drafts, changes, sources and review declarations. A page, checksum or merged pull request does not establish a scientific result or independent review.

Edition
edition:2026-11-07-encyclopedia
Edition checksum
e146b1666792c4b20504af099ca65663d0f70fea584397f38cb5eda241137bde
Projection checksum
a017dac8fb17a969a8d72ae660365d8c9a3840125e29cb258e797f50a27552ed
Period
inclusive to exclusive.
Starting baseline
Unknown before the recorded capture. Present states are not backdated to January.

JSON retains the complete pinned edition. CSV covers every recorded event in this edition; view filters do not change either download.

Recorded activity and qualification

  • 69Stable records
  • 71Subject versions
  • 69Recorded events
  • 0Review declarations
  • 0Subjects with qualifying source review
  • 0Peer-reviewed manuscripts
  • 0Qualifying research results
  • 1Editorial correction artifacts
  • 2Changed claim subjects
  • 23Open problems
  • 0Partially resolved problems
  • 0Solved problems
  • 0Problems under review
  • 0Unresolved challenges

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself. Editorial corrections, proposed methods and software checks are separate from qualifying research results.

Coverage and limits

66 source entries are covered by this edition. Claim-level records cover only their selected wording and context; they do not qualify a whole manuscript. Source-derived case labels describe the published summaries, not Charitology fieldwork or charity ratings.

Entry links open the present site. The separate pinned source text retains this edition’s exact archived bytes.

Symptoms and sources · Encyclopedia entry · version 1
Source review: draft

concept:symptoms-and-sources

Qualification follows the exact recorded public declarations. The ledger cannot establish identity, independence, source reading or truth by itself.

Versions and exact subjects

Version entries 1–1

Version 1: Symptoms and sources

Current subject in this edition

Subject checksum
76c629ab8bb7eb283e720b7f64dc8a646ea7631a2a9bfbabd5ce5518cadcedbb
Version checksum
47b6cbf43a3b0e2d73e2d86c51d202b9fbed21c1ae3981aa8b2d6e212e618dd8
Authorship declaration
unknown; completeness unknown.
aliases
[
  "root causes",
  "upstream causes"
]
conditions
[
  {
    "collection": "conditions",
    "id": "symptom-trap"
  }
]
related
[
  "/method/",
  "/record/encyclopedia/source-depth/",
  "/record/cause-atlas/"
]
summary
The core distinction of charitology. A symptom is a problem as it shows up in people’s lives. A source is what keeps producing it upstream.
Exact archived Markdown body

Inert source text, including its original formatting. It is not executed as page markup.

A **symptom** is a problem as it shows up in someone’s life: hunger tonight, an untreated fever, a flooded home. A **source** is something upstream that keeps producing problems, often many at once.

## Why the distinction matters

Symptoms are urgent, visible and real, and helping with them is good. Some needs recur because the conditions producing them persist. A food bank feeds people tonight, and tomorrow there is a line again. Charitology asks every gift where it acts on the chain from symptom to source, and asks the system as a whole whether its mix is right. That is the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/).

## The six sources

Humanity’s Checklist argues that the world’s problems grow from a few shared sources inside humanity’s collective life:

- **Story**: the story we tell ourselves about what is possible
- **Coordination**: whether the people who could solve a problem together ever meet
- **Vision**: whether we can picture the future we want to build
- **Attention**: what our feeds and media reward
- **Status**: what a culture admires
- **Gatekeepers**: who gets to build and be seen

Fixing a source, the checklist argues, stops it feeding the problems below it and starts it feeding the cure. Charitology adopts these six as the top of its [depth scale](/record/encyclopedia/source-depth/) and treats the claim that fixing them would help everything downstream as a hypothesis to test.

## Between symptom and source

Most work sits in between. Charitology’s depth scale has five levels: relief, repair, prevention, structure and source. Bed nets are prevention: they stop malaria for the people who sleep under them. A ban on lead paint is structure: it changes the rules that produced the harm. The scale describes where the work acts. It does not say which level is better. A healthy system funds all five on purpose.
Cited evidence
Pinned source capture
Exact version fields and declaration references
{
  "adapterVersion": "research-encyclopedia-v1",
  "authorship": {
    "actorIds": [],
    "complete": false,
    "refs": [],
    "state": "unknown"
  },
  "hash": "47b6cbf43a3b0e2d73e2d86c51d202b9fbed21c1ae3981aa8b2d6e212e618dd8",
  "id": "version:concept-symptoms-and-sources-v1",
  "previousId": null,
  "recordId": "concept:symptoms-and-sources",
  "sources": [
    {
      "selector": {
        "kind": "entry"
      },
      "sourceId": "source:encyclopedia-symptoms-and-sources-v1"
    }
  ],
  "subject": {
    "body": "\nA **symptom** is a problem as it shows up in someone’s life: hunger tonight, an untreated fever, a flooded home. A **source** is something upstream that keeps producing problems, often many at once.\n\n## Why the distinction matters\n\nSymptoms are urgent, visible and real, and helping with them is good. Some needs recur because the conditions producing them persist. A food bank feeds people tonight, and tomorrow there is a line again. Charitology asks every gift where it acts on the chain from symptom to source, and asks the system as a whole whether its mix is right. That is the [Symptom Trap](/diagnosis/symptom-trap/).\n\n## The six sources\n\nHumanity’s Checklist argues that the world’s problems grow from a few shared sources inside humanity’s collective life:\n\n- **Story**: the story we tell ourselves about what is possible\n- **Coordination**: whether the people who could solve a problem together ever meet\n- **Vision**: whether we can picture the future we want to build\n- **Attention**: what our feeds and media reward\n- **Status**: what a culture admires\n- **Gatekeepers**: who gets to build and be seen\n\nFixing a source, the checklist argues, stops it feeding the problems below it and starts it feeding the cure. Charitology adopts these six as the top of its [depth scale](/record/encyclopedia/source-depth/) and treats the claim that fixing them would help everything downstream as a hypothesis to test.\n\n## Between symptom and source\n\nMost work sits in between. Charitology’s depth scale has five levels: relief, repair, prevention, structure and source. Bed nets are prevention: they stop malaria for the people who sleep under them. A ban on lead paint is structure: it changes the rules that produced the harm. The scale describes where the work acts. It does not say which level is better. A healthy system funds all five on purpose.\n",
    "collection": "encyclopedia",
    "frontmatter": {
      "aliases": [
        "root causes",
        "upstream causes"
      ],
      "conditions": [
        {
          "collection": "conditions",
          "id": "symptom-trap"
        }
      ],
      "related": [
        "/method/",
        "/record/encyclopedia/source-depth/",
        "/record/cause-atlas/"
      ],
      "sources": [
        {
          "note": null,
          "publisher": "Humanity’s Checklist",
          "title": "Humanity’s Checklist: six things to fix so we can fix everything else",
          "url": "https://humanityschecklist.org/",
          "year": 2026
        }
      ],
      "summary": "The core distinction of charitology. A symptom is a problem as it shows up in people’s lives. A source is what keeps producing it upstream.",
      "title": "Symptoms and sources"
    },
    "type": "entry"
  },
  "subjectHash": "76c629ab8bb7eb283e720b7f64dc8a646ea7631a2a9bfbabd5ce5518cadcedbb",
  "version": 1
}

Timeline in recorded order

Public occurrence time and ledger recording time are different. A coverage baseline records what was present at capture; it does not invent an earlier history.

Events 1–1

Coverage baseline

Recorded order
66; sequence 1 for this record.
Public occurrence
Undated / no earlier occurrence asserted · undated
Recorded in ledger

Additional exact-source encyclopedia coverage. Earlier authorship, source reading, independent review and historical event dates remain unknown.

Observed baseline: version 1.

Exact event fields
{
  "actorIds": [],
  "hash": "b716de06dd9291c8d7567a5958eac94443a8ca187f66922a7c390ee996e97ef9",
  "id": "event:concept-symptoms-and-sources-1",
  "initialProblemState": null,
  "observationIds": [],
  "occurredAt": null,
  "ordinal": 66,
  "previousHash": null,
  "previousId": null,
  "reason": "Additional exact-source encyclopedia coverage. Earlier authorship, source reading, independent review and historical event dates remain unknown.",
  "recordId": "concept:symptoms-and-sources",
  "recordedAt": "2026-11-07T23:20:18.679Z",
  "refs": [],
  "sequence": 1,
  "timeBasis": "undated",
  "type": "baseline",
  "version": {
    "recordId": "concept:symptoms-and-sources",
    "subjectHash": "76c629ab8bb7eb283e720b7f64dc8a646ea7631a2a9bfbabd5ce5518cadcedbb",
    "version": 1
  }
}

Review declarations

No public review declaration is recorded for this subject in this edition.

Dated public metadata observations

These observations record only the displayed metadata at inspection. A merge, closed issue or empty review list does not establish research or independent review.

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "975bbbbbd198d4b3c4e1777013d0410588a838b3",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "3653d41717a86db2933b02664d7026a329350a66",
  "mergeCommit": "8df2d0ddbc6d91b9841c6bbb94dbde1fc7c00137",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-27T08:10:57.000Z",
  "number": 15,
  "state": "closed"
}

be39e645f9291ea3931584665b011df77bfa8340e4d32f36562eb526f8e62396

github-pull-request · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "base": "905bdd27bb5f16027c3b3ad3c0f5ee3fc18e3e45",
  "draft": false,
  "head": "510320528e89f45caa9c42eb5a6eda3d6ad1bede",
  "mergeCommit": "3a57d24acc6efd4eb3ae60c59da36ea17c023fb9",
  "mergedAt": "2026-10-26T05:24:43.000Z",
  "number": 3,
  "state": "closed"
}

1ec26b57bd6ef466311b11958d47e9d144ec150ea5689838ae8036eb363aacbf

github-review-list · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "prNumber": 3,
  "reviewIds": []
}

3b7b719dbdd25b9937ba6c640f7234921611db30818b5675db41b9fa3534d926

github-issue · 2026-10-27T08:20:16.587Z

Observed public object

{
  "commentCount": 0,
  "number": 1,
  "state": "open"
}

b411d756f95b7434bc8a2a73dd5599f751afe621b2ab673c0e2e7b056d37bb14

Corrections stay public

This ledger reads checked-in public evidence. It does not read private browser registers, publish a local result, assign reviewers or rate charities. New evidence and corrections enter through the repository’s public contribution process.

How to contribute or challenge a claim